Click for Jaipur, India Forecast
ARTICLES    >>   A CRASH COURSE ON LEG-SPINNING
 

What should a knowledgeable cricketer, and any captain, understand about leg-spinning?

1. THE NATURE OF LEG-SPIN :

The leg-spinner MUST try to spin the ball hard. Reducing flick, rolling the ball out, in order to attain accuracy is not the answer. The aim should be to spin the ball hard, then bowl enough to obtain accuracy with a real flick. Thus the leg-spinner must bowl a great deal both In the nets and in match situations. In the nets, a two hour spell is a minimum; less than a hour is simply a warm up. in the match, he is both strike bowler and stock bowler to be effective he needs a lot of work.

There are different types of leg-spinners, who have Individual advantages and disadvantages. The quicker leggie is usually a bigger, taller man, whilst the slower leggie is usually a shorter version. As I said, they have differences but neither is necessarily right and the other wrong.

Unless he is an O'Reilly, who was unique, the alms are similar. They are to confuse a batsman's judgment of length. The turn of the ball is NOT the only or, even, major object. Turn, in fact, is only finishing off the confusion of length judgment which has resulted from subtle variations in trajectory and pace, drop, drift and bounce, which are created by variations of over-spin, side-spin, and back-spin. The side-spin which creates turn off the, pitch is the best known and most easily recognised, but, in fact, over-spin and back-spin are probably more significant ingredients of the leg-spinner's tactics.

Thus bowling faster in order to achieve quicker turn is seldom an advantage. It may be for an O'Reilly type, but for the normal spinner, a slower spinner, increased pace simply - flattens the trajectory of the delivery and decreases the deception of flight he depends upon.

As a general rule, the ball should travel from the bowler's hand above eye level until it begins to drop. "Never let batsman see top of ball," was the advice of an old Lancastrian spinner.

2. LINE :

Most leg-spinners attempt to bowl along middle and off-stump line, for the same reason that out-swing bowlers do. They both have the same advantage, they are moving away from the right hand batsman's eyes and feet, and should utilise this by bowling around off-stump.

Recently, a policy of leg-stump line has been broadcast. Few bowlers have ever bowled that line in the past, few have ever been accurate enough. For, along such a line, the full ball is hit away on the leg-side and the short ball, with the spin, to the off. All bowlers should attempt to attack one side of the stumps only, and a leg-spinner can do this, and usually has done so, by bowling middle and off .

3. USE :

An experienced leg-spinner will have available a repertoire including a wrong 'un or two, an over-the-top-spinner, a back spinner which skids on straight, and varying angles of leg-spin. He needs time to weave these into his spinning web.

To bowl leg-spinners for an over or two before lunch, tea or stumps is a gross misuse. A leg spinner must have time to build his attack, just as a batsman must have time to build an innings.

A leg-spinner is an excellent weapon to bring into an attack against any new batsman, to begin a new session's play, or against the tail. Where as medium pace is likely to play batsman in, leg-spinning forces them to think and make decisions. There is no more attacking pair than a down-wind quick and an up-wind leg-spinner.

4. ACCURACY :

It is a myth that leg-spinners are usually inaccurate and expensive. Bad leg - spinners may be, but so are bad medium pacers and quick's. Quality leg-spinners have always been accurate and, as often as not, most economic.

No one speaks of rapid run-rates when 0'Reilly and Grimmett bowled in tandem; Benaud was pin-point accurate; Jim Higgs, in his era, was usually Victoria's most economic bowler; whilst Trevor Hohns is always very tight and inexpensive.

But no leg-spinner has a chance of being accurate, or of being a dangerous wicket- taker unless he bowls a great deal. You cannot be a part-time leggie; it is most difficult of all bowling forms; it needs time and work.

But the captain who makes his leg-spinner feel wanted, gives him responsibility, and uses him as both stock and shock bowler has at his disposal a major attacking weapon. If he has real talent, he is virtually half of an attack.

5. FIELD PLACEMENT :

Remember that with the variety he has available and if he spins the ball hard, the leg-spinner can never be negative. By his very nature of bowling, he is an aggressive, positive bowler. Thus he does not need ultra-attacking fields to justify his credentials.

A leg-spinner may like to start with two on the boundary at square leg and mid-wicket. If it makes him comfortable as he sets out to spin the ball hard and throw the ball up, let him have them. After all, quick's often bowl with a fine leg and third man without being accused of negativism. As the leggie, settles down, he may choose to bring in one or both the boundary riders, but, if he is more comfortable with them out there; give them to him.

Very seldom does a leg-spinner benefit from a bat-pad fieldsman. There may be occasions when he may wish to crowd the bat, but generally he does not like or use such close fieldsmen. The modern argument is that bat-pads put pressure on batsmen, but more often than not they put more pressure on the bowler, who, in response, tends to tighten up, reduce variation, speed up, and flatten in order to bowl to that field.

On good wickets, good batsmen thrive on bat-pad fieldsman. Two such fieldsmen remove two from the in-field, gaps open up, runs are more easily come by, and pressure reduces. A far more worrying fieldsman to the batsman in full cry on a good wicket is short cover, short mid-on, or short mid-wicket about 20 yards from the bat.

So don't forever force close fieldsmen on leg-spinners. For some, never use them; for others, use them as a variation; for none make them a permanent tactic. Remember that a leg-spinner is often more effective if you withdraw the field, loosen the batsman up and encourage him to play shots, rather than trying to tighten him up with close-set fields .

A Captain should always think of his nine fielders as pawns to be used as each situation demands. It is limiting to become too rigid in your planning of set, pre-conceived field-placements. Of course, there are basic, bread and butter fields, but always be prepared to improvise. I recommend the old captaincy adage - "If you think of something which is a positive, aggressive change, don't wait, do it at once. If you think of a change which is negative and defensive, don't hurry into it, it can wait.

For a basis of discussion, I set out below traditional, orthodox field-placements for a right hand leg-spinner to a right had batsman and a left hand batsman. Following these are a few explanatory notes.

 
(a)
To a right hand batsman, in normal circumstances, that is, on a good wicket, on a hot day, attacking middle and off stump.
   
 
   
Nb. 1)
Slip must be positioned carefully according to the type of leg-spinner. The slower, bigger turner may require a wider, closer slip, whilst the quicker leggie may have him deeper and straighter. But, based on your experience, you must place him exactly where you want him, and not simply settle for "a slip."

2)

Short extra cover is a major attacking fieldsman for a leg-spinner. Not too close, about 15-20 yards from the bat, he is far enough back to see and catch anything hit at him. The slightly lofted drive is out, a worrying thought for any batsman if the ball is drifting, dropping, bouncing and turning.

3)

With the short extra-cover, mid-off and cover can be a little deeper yet still stop the single, particularly if both bowler and short cover move quickly towards the ball and so hold the striker back momentarily remember IN-FIELDSMEN MUST STOP SINGLES; a failure to do so make it very difficult to bowl as batsmen constantly change ends.

4)

Mid-wicket, too, can be useful shortish" for the same reasons as extra cover, particularly if the bowler values his wrong 'un.

5)

Few leg-spinners have ever bowled without one on the boundary; many used two, particularly in opening overs. Perhaps when you settle down, the out-fieldsmen may be brought in to strengthen the in-field or close catchers.

6)

One on the boundary; many Perhaps when you settle to strengthen the in field plus the keeper are behind the wicket very strong. If I am trying to spin drop, drift and turn, keeping it well Mote that only two fieldsmen and the straight hit field is the ball hard, getting it to up, and encouraging batsmen to drive, this is the way the field should be. On occasions, I watch leg-spinners bowl with a backward point, slip, short backward square, deep backward square and keeper, al 1 behind the wicket. What can their plan be when half the team is fielding behind the stumps?

b)

To a left-hand batsman (in normal circumstances, a good wicket, a hot day, trying to bowler well up about a foot outside the left hander's off-stump where there are usually'some scuff marks.)
   
 
   
1)
Much the same as the right-hander's field, in reverse. The bowler must aim to keep well outside off-stump. If his line begins to squeeze into the left hander's legs, he will be worked away easily on the on-side or even carved up.

2)

To the left hander both square-legs, short and deep, should be behind square, because of the direction of turn.

3)

For the same reason, short mid-wicket becomes as significant as short cover was the right hander.

4)

Slip is probable finer now.

5)

Short cover is still important, particularly if the bowler values his wrong 'un.

6)

Same comments are out fieldsmen and in fieldsmen.
 

What I have outlined above are basic, orthodox field placements adopted by orthodox leg-spinners over the last 50 years. They are worthy of consideration if you want leg-spinners as part of your attack .

5o where do you stand, Mr Captain? Is your plan to be positive and aggressive, attack the batsman whenever possible, try to dismiss .them as quickly as possible in order to create time to force a win? If so, you need a leg-spinner in the conditions of this country. Or are you a safety-first man who tries to ensure he cannot lose before he tries to win; whose first thought is containment, wasting time, restricting over rates? If so, then leg-spinning is not for you, but you are a hindrance to the development of Australian Cricket.

Leg-spinning is on the way back, I am confident of this. The game wants it back, needs it back. It is part of all that is exciting and entertaining in. cricket. Real pace plus leg-spin were always the foundations of Australian Cricket, and I hope to see that foundation re-built.

But if we do, there is a generation of modern cricketers who need a crash-course in the techniques and tactics of leg-spinning. What I have written here is only an introduction to such a course. Hopefully it may spark further interest, and, if it does. I would willingly answer your questions through this magazine in the months ahead.

 
 
Copyright © 2005-2008 Rajasthan Colts- All rights reserved Site Design & Develope By S.S.Compusoft